h1

Manchester City, The New “Bank Of England” Club

Fri, 17 July 2009

The term “Bank of England” club has been used at various times before and after World War II to describe the English club of the day with the greatest financial clout.

For example:

In the thirties Arsenal were known as the Bank of England club as it’s sound finances allowed for the purchase of any player required.

The term was also applied to Sunderland in the early 1950s “because of their large money signings”.

In the early 1960s, Tottenham Hotspur were the “richest football club on earth”.

Manchester United have consistently been the biggest earners in English football for more than decade, and along with Real Madrid, have for several years been amongst the biggest earners in world football.

Despite lower revenues, Chelsea have demonstrated greater spending power than Manchester United since being bought by Roman Abramovich in 2003.

“….  [His] his wealth often allows the club to purchase players virtually at will although that has changed in recent years.  ….

….

….  As of May 2008, Abramovich has spent approximately £600 million (€705 million) on the club since arriving in 2003.”

An extremely rich owner allows a club to spend big without the dangers of borrowing and incurring massive debt (of which dangers Leeds United provide a good illustration).

Manchester City now appear to have the richest owners of allAbu Dhabi United Group.

With the globalization of football in general and English football in particular, foreign ownership of an English club is not unusual.  What is unusual is the immense wealth of some of the new owners, prepared to spend limitless amounts on new players.

Mediocre or struggling clubs finding success with the aid of a rich benefactor is nothing new in English football. The first successes enjoyed by Manchester United in the early 1900s was with fortuitously-obtained financial backing:

” ….  [In] 1902, the club neared bankruptcy, with debts of over £2,500. At one point, their Bank Street ground was even closed by the bailiffs.

Just before having to be shut down for good, the club received a sizeable investment from J. H. Davies, the managing director of Manchester Breweries. Legend goes that Harry Stafford, the club captain, was showing off his prized St. Bernard dog at a club fund-raiser, when Davies approached him to buy the dog. Stafford declined, but was able to persuade Davies to invest in the club and become club chairman.  ….

Further:

… Davies decided in 1909 that the Bank Street ground was not fit for a team that had recently won the First Division and FA Cup, so he donated funds for the construction of a new stadium[,], … settling on a patch of land … in Old Trafford.

… Including the purchase of the land, the construction of the stadium was originally to have cost £60,000 all told. ….  [At] a time when transfer fees were still around the £1,000 mark, the cost of construction only served to reinforce the club’s “Moneybags United” epithet, with which they had been tarred since Davies had taken over as chairman.

In terms of their current financial strength, Manchester City may well be a modern “Bank of England” club.  However, with the internationalization of English football, the term may well be too parochial, and not in keeping with the times.

Perhaps “Moneybags City”?

About these ads

9 comments

  1. Link added here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/robborobson/2009/07/cash_n_grab.html#comment259


  2. Link also added here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A54565554


  3. [...] As for Manchester City and their spending spree, are they a modern-day “Bank of England” club? [...]


  4. [...] Insights A collation of my football-related articles and posts « Manchester City, The New “Bank Of England” Club Notts County Wed, 22 July [...]


  5. Link also added here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/robborobson/2009/07/cash_n_grab.html#P83617778


  6. Another link added here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/philmcnulty/2009/08/manchester_city_making_waves.html#P84791864


  7. [...] 35 years as being my all-time favourite player, but I feel the adverse reaction to his sacking by Manchester City has been [...]


  8. [...] Manchester City, in an effort to break into the top 4 in England. [...]


  9. [...] Total transfer fees paid by Premier League clubs increased rapidly from 1992 onwards.  The trend has continued until recently, up to 2008 (the latest figures available from Deloitte).  High transfer fees have been sustained over the last two years by Manchester City. [...]



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: